The Social Production of Unequal Development: A Structuration Analysis of Tourism in Mandalika Special Economic Zone

Authors

  • Sally Salsabila Universitas Mataram
  • Muhammad Arwan Rosyadi Universitas Mataram
  • Khalifatul Syuhada Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i9.2567

Keywords:

Tourism-Led Development, Unequal Development, Structuration Theory, Community Agency, Mandalika Special Economic Zone

Abstract

Tourism-led development can expand employment and business opportunities while simultaneously producing uneven social outcomes. This study examined how institutional rules, access to resources, and community agency shaped differentiated development outcomes in Kuta Village within Indonesia’s Mandalika Special Economic Zone. An interpretive qualitative single-case study was conducted with ten participants. Community members’ and business actors’ perspectives were collected through semi-structured interviews, while institutional and local elite perspectives were obtained through an online qualitative questionnaire containing open-ended questions. Nonparticipant observation and documentary materials provided additional contextual evidence. Data were analyzed using abductive thematic analysis informed by Giddens’ Structuration Theory. The findings showed that tourism development expanded employment, entrepreneurship, market access, and opportunities for livelihood adaptation; however, participants differed in their capacity to convert these opportunities into secure and sustained benefits. Unequal access to land, capital, commercial space, markets, strategic information, institutional networks, and decision-making authority contributed to differentiated economic outcomes and varying levels of community influence. Residents exercised agency through entrepreneurship, trading, skills development, and livelihood adaptation, while participation was stronger in economic activities and program implementation than in strategic decision-making processes. The findings indicate that more equitable development requires broader access to resources, substantive participation in decision-making, and differentiated capacity-building strategies.

References

Ashley, C., & Roe, D. (2002). Making tourism work for the poor: Strategies and challenges in Southern Africa. Development Southern Africa, 19, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350220123855

Ashley, C., Roe, D., & Goodwin, H. (2001). Pro-poor tourism strategies: Making tourism work for the poor: A review of experience. Overseas Development Institute.

Chaniago, D. S., Nugroho, H., & Isbah, M. F. (2024). Masyarakat lokal dalam konfigurasi kapitalisme negara di sektor pariwisata: Studi Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Mandalika. Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas, 10, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.25077/jsa.10.1.1-17.2024

Devine, J. A., & Ojeda, D. (2017). Violence and dispossession in tourism development: A critical geographical approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25, 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1293401

Gascon, J. (2015). Pro-poor tourism as a strategy to fight rural poverty: A critique. Journal of Agrarian Change, 15, 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12087

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.

Imran, L. H., & Wijaya, S. R. (2025). Collaborative governance for sustainable tourism development: Strategy development and reflections from the KEK Mandalika case study, Indonesia. Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP), 7, 61–74.

Jamal, T. B., & Getz, D. (1995). Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Annals of Tourism Research, 22, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)00067-3

Jumrah, J., & Imran, K. S. (2024). Need analysis of English conversation for hawkers in Mandalika Special Economic Zone, West Nusa Tenggara. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12, 322–354. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i1.4904

Pattaray, A., Satiadji, A. R., & Lantang, A. G. (2025). Revitalizing rural tourism through collaborative community participation in Mandalika MotoGP mega event. Cogent Social Sciences, 11, 2516832. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2516832

Putra Kumara Dewa, J. J., Wahyuningtiyas, L., & Cahyana, A. (2024). Optimization of poverty alleviation programs through the classification of village characteristics around the Mandalika Special Economic Zone (SEZ). GREENOMIKA, 6, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.55732/unu.gnk.2024.06.2.4

Putri, N., Diswandi, & Wijimulawiani, B. S. (2026). Alih fungsi lahan pertanian dan kesejahteraan masyarakat di KEK Mandalika: Studi kasus Desa Kuta. GEMILANG: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 6, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.56910/gemilang.v6i1.3456

Rahmat, A., Suci, A., & Abdillah, M. R. (2023). Menuju transformasi desa kreatif: Sebuah tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Komunitas Sains Manajemen, 2, 271–278.

Rani, A. P., Nurjannah, S., Hamdi, S., Chaniago, D. S., & Salsabila, S. (2024). Hambatan adaptasi mata pencarian kelompok rentan dalam relokasi masyarakat pesisir KEK Mandalika. RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual, 6, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.29303/resiprokal.v6i2.616

Reindrawati, D. Y. (2023). Challenges of community participation in tourism planning in developing countries. Cogent Social Sciences, 9, 2164240. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2164240

Salsabila, S. (2026). Beyond poverty reduction: Rethinking inequality and institutional justice in Indonesia. Journal of Social Development Studies, 7. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsds.26003

Sayuti, R. H., Taqiuddin, M., Hayati, Evendi, A., Hidayati, S. A., Asri, K. H., & Sopian, E. (2023). Socio-economic mapping for community empowerment in Mandalika Special Economic Zone, Lombok, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1253, 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1253/1/012067

Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management, 20, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00069-7

Scheyvens, R., & Biddulph, R. (2018). Inclusive tourism development. Tourism Geographies, 20, 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1381985

Suleman, D., Supiandi, Yuli, S. B. C., Muttaqin, Z., & Martayadi, U. (2023). Balancing cultural shock and economic development: A study of impacts on local culture in the Mandalika Special Economic Zone. Journal of Enterprise and Development, 5, 522–534. https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v5iSpecial-Issue-2.8158

Tosun, C. (2000). Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tourism Management, 21, 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00009-1

Veriasa, T. O., Aliadi, A., Nugroho, A., Cantika, F. S. P., Panggabean, I. B., Purwanto, S., & Septria, D. (2023). The contribution of community-based tourism to household income: Evidence from West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 10, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.59465/ijfr.2023.10.2.169-184

Yuli, S. B. C., Septiani, E., Pramuja, R. A., Supiandi, & Najmudin, M. (2023). Tourism development and local community welfare: A case study of the Mandalika Special Economic Zone. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14, 2097–2106. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.4(68).21

Zitri, I., Kurniawan, C., Joni, M., & Harakan, A. (2025). Sustainable tourism development in the Mandalika Special Economic Zone: A comprehensive analysis of social, economic, and environmental impacts. Jurnal Public Policy, 11, 489–498. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v11i4.11606

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Salsabila, S., Rosyadi, M. A., & Syuhada, K. (2026). The Social Production of Unequal Development: A Structuration Analysis of Tourism in Mandalika Special Economic Zone. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 7(9), 3969–3986. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i9.2567