Professional Ethics of Marriage Officiants from a Legal Perspective: A Juridical-Empirical Study of Indications of Gratification and Conflicts of Interest in Marriage Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i5.2331Keywords:
conflict of interest, gratification, marriage services, professional ethics, registrarsAbstract
Public services, including marriage registration, require integrity and professional ethics from state officials to prevent malpractices such as gratification and conflicts of interest. However, empirical reality often shows a gap between legal norms and field practices. This research aims to analyze the professional ethics of marriage registrars from a legal perspective and to examine indications of gratification practices and conflicts of interest in marriage services. The research employs a juridical-empirical method with statutory and sociological approaches, using literature review and interviews with informants at an anonymized Office of Religious Affairs. The findings reveal a gap between ethical norms and practices in the field, indicated by informal giving from the public to registrars and the role of intermediaries in handling administrative procedures, which may give rise to conflicts of interest. These practices are influenced by cultural factors, limited transparency, and insufficient public understanding of official procedures. The study concludes that strengthening oversight, enhancing service transparency, and improving public education are essential to achieving integrity and accountability in marriage services.
References
Agus, D. (2017). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.31214
Alamineh, G. A., Hussein, J. W., Endaweke, Y., & Taddesse, B. (2023). The local communities’ perceptions on the social impact of tourism and its implication for sustainable development in Amhara regional state. Heliyon, 9(6).
Bovens, M. (2014). Public accountability. In The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0001
Chapman, B. (2024). The profession of government: The public service in Europe. Routledge.
Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Faridah, L., & Mahmud, H. (2022). Conflict of interest in public service: A study on governance and integrity. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 26(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.65890
Grossi, G., Steccolini, I., Adhikari, P., Brown, J., Christensen, M., Cordery, C., Ferry, L., Lassou, P., McDonald III, B., & Raudla, R. (2023). The future of public sector accounting research: A polyphonic debate. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 20(1), 1–37.
Hadjon, P. M., Djatmiati, T. S., Beschanstin, M., & Ten Berge, J. B. J. M. (2015). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911185
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Memahami gratifikasi. KPK. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi/leaflet/umum/8-memahami-gratifikasi
Mudzhar, M. A. (2020). Peran lembaga keagamaan dalam pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 30(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2020.30.2.6725
Nurhayati, S., & Safa'at, R. (2020). Praktik informal dalam pelayanan publik dan implikasinya terhadap tata kelola pemerintahan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 13(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jap.2020.013.02.5
Pramusinto, A., & Purwanto, E. A. (2019). Reforming public service delivery in Indonesia: The role of governance and anti-corruption measures. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1594323
Prasojo, E. (2020). Bureaucratic reform and public service improvement in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.1-10
Republic of Indonesia. (1974). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-1-tahun-1974
Republic of Indonesia. (2001). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Republic of Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019.
Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.
Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-25-tahun-2009
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 48 Tahun 2014 tentang Tarif atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang Berlaku pada Kementerian Agama jo. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2015.
Republic of Indonesia. (2019a). Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-16-tahun-2019
Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Religion. (2019b). Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 20 Tahun 2019 tentang Pencatatan Pernikahan. https://peraturan.go.id/id/permenag-no-20-tahun-2019
Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.
Robinson, M. (2015). Improving governance for better public services. World Development, 74, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962933
Sedarmayanti. (2017). Reformasi administrasi publik, reformasi birokrasi, dan kepemimpinan masa depan. Refika Aditama.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sunggono, B. (2018). Metodologi penelitian hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Achmad Shiva’ul Haq Asjach

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




